difficile-infected mice, and the significantly higher expression of Reg3g, suggests a scenario where the recruitment of STAT3 to the IL-22 receptor[72, 73] and its consequent phosphorylation would initiate signalling pathways

involved in epithelial repair and find more wound healing. Second, given the concurrent phosphorylation of eIF2α, AKT and STAT3 in the caeca and colons of the infected mice, STAT3 phosphorylation may be in part mediated by PKR. The phosphorylated STAT3 generated in this manner can then contribute to epithelial homeostasis and wound repair.[19] Third, one can raise the possibility of STAT3 recruitment to, and its phosphorylation on, the IL-10 receptor. Interleukin-10 can inhibit the production of a distinct, yet diverse, set of inflammatory mediators. This is achieved

by selectively inhibiting transcription and requires STAT3 activation on the IL-10 receptor.[74] The pro-inflammatory genes Ccl2, Ccl3, Csf2, Cxcl1, Il1b, Il6 and Tnfa, that are up-regulated in the caeca and/or colons of the C. difficile-infected mice, belong to the subset of genes whose transcription is controlled in this manner. However, the fact that C. difficile-infected mice do not display an increase in Il10 expression as a result of the infection, makes this an unlikely scenario. We contend that the concomitant induction of a local pro-inflammatory response, and the production of IL-22 Sirolimus cell line and RegIIIγ, constitute the host’s standard way of containing and counteracting PRKACG an acute infection in the gut. Our study shows the phosphorylation of eIF2α in the infected mice, but not the full-fledged induction of the UPR. On the weight of evidence, it is plausible that PKR, and not PERK, is responsible for the phosphorylation of eIF2α. This prediction can be put to the test by using intestinal epithelial cell-specific

PERK and PKR knockout mice. Our study also provides evidence for the induction of pro-survival signalling, which may contribute to the host’s return to epithelial homeostasis. The phosphorylation of eIF2α as a result of infection raises the prospect that phosphorylated eIF2α confers the same protective effect in acute C. difficile infection as the one it confers against chemically induced colitis.[19] This, in conjunction with the induction of pro-survival signals, can be used to argue that manipulation of common biochemical pathways such as those related to translational control and pro-survival signalling, rather than disease-specific and pathogen-specific approaches, could potentially be of therapeutic benefit across a spectrum of conditions with analogous and/or shared pathophysiologies.