Grice’s Cooperative Principle and maxims (1975/1989) characterise

Grice’s Cooperative Principle and maxims (1975/1989) characterise how such information is communicated. Grice proposed that

interlocutors assume each other to be cooperative, and specifically informative, truthful, concise and relevant. If what is explicitly said by the speaker violates any of these assumptions, listeners may infer additional information that would repair such a violation. These pragmatic inferences are known as implicatures. Specifically, the implicature (1c) is derived because Jane is assumed to obey the first maxim of Quantity, which requires her to be as informative as is required for the communicative purpose (Grice, 1975/1989; see also Horn, 1972, Horn, LDN-193189 supplier 1984 and Levinson, 1983; i.a.). The inference would be derived in (at least) two steps. The first step involves determining whether the speaker could have made a more informative statement: in this case, Jane could have said that she danced with John and Bill. Given (1a), this extra information would be relevant. The second step involves the negation of the more informative statement that was identified in the first step. This reasoning is valid because, if Jane is adhering to the first maxim of Quantity,

she is not being underinformative. Therefore, the most likely reason why she did not make the more informative statement is that it is not true. In this way she communicates the negation of the stronger statement implicitly through a quantity mafosfamide implicature (see Geurts (2010), for a detailed discussion). buy AT13387 Similarly, the first step in the derivation of (2c) involves determining that there is a statement (‘all of my class failed’) that would have been relevant and more informative than (2b). In the second step, the hearer reasons that Jane did not make the more informative statement because it does not hold, which is the inference in (2c). Because (2b) is part of a scale of informativeness formed by propositions with the quantifiers ‘some’, ‘many’, ‘most’, ‘all’, it may be considered

a special case of quantity implicature, namely a scalar implicature. Investigations of the acquisition of scalar implicature have reported that children younger than 7 years of age cannot derive these implicatures at adult-like levels, or at levels comparable to their competence with explicit meaning (see Barner et al., 2011, Feeney et al., 2004, Foppolo et al., submitted for publication and Guasti et al., 2005; Huang & Snedeker, 2009a; Hurewitz et al., 2006, Katsos, 2009, Katsos et al., 2010, Noveck, 2001, Papafragou and Musolino, 2003, Papafragou and Tantalou, 2004 and Pouscoulous et al., 2007; among others. See Noveck & Reboul, 2009, for an overview). This is consistent with work on whether children detect ambiguity in referential communication tasks.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>