Growth curve and doubling time (Figure 2) The doubling time of dr

05). Growth curve and doubling time (Figure 2) The doubling time of drug-resistant cells was significantly extended compared with parent cells. The doubling times in Bel-7402, Bel-7402/ADMS, Bel-7402/ADML and Bel-7402/ADMV cells were 39 h, 45 h, 46 h and 65 h, Fludarabine respectively. Figure 2 Cells growth curve. The doubling time of the cells was proportional to the drug-resistance of cell lines. Uptake and excretion of ADM (Table 2) The excretion rate of Bel-7402, Bel-7402/ADMS, Bel-7402/ADML and Bel-7402/ADMV cells to ADM were 34.14%, 61.56%, 66.56% and 81.06%, respectively. The relative fluorescent intensity in each group

find more of cells was reduced after the excretion of ADM and drug-resistant cells were more obvious compared with parent cells. Table 2 Cellular relative fluorescent intensity after the uptake and excretion

of ADM. Cell Cellular relative fluorescence intensity of ADM Excretion rate of ADM (%)   After Uptake After Excretion   Bel-7402 (Parent) 11.19 ± 0.23 7.37 ± 0.16 34.14 Bel-7402/ADMS 15.27 ± 0.22 5.87 ± 0.13 61.56 Bel-7402/ADML 15.61 ± 0.18 5.22 ± 0.13 66.56 Bel-7402/ADMV 19.11 ± 0.15 3.62 ± 0.17 81.06 F 1338.016 531.312   P 0.000 0.000   Note: By LSD paired-comparison after the uptake and excretion, drug-resistant cellular relative fluorescent intensity of ADM showed significant differences (P < 0.05). Variation of expression of P-gp, MRP and GSH/GST detected this website by flow cytometry (Table 3) Expression of P-gp in the three groups of the resistant cells was significantly enhanced (P < 0.01). The MRP fluorescence staining rates were also significantly raised in the three groups of drug resistant cells, the in vitro induction group with the highest rate, the other two groups relatively lower. It is shown that the peak dramatically moves to the right of the coordinate system (Figure 3). The expression of GSH/GST in the three groups showed no statistical significance by paired-comparison (P >0.05). Table 3 Staining rate of P-gp, MRP and GSH/GST fluorescent cells analyzed by flow

cytometry. Cell Expression rate (%, ± s)   P-gp MRP GSH/GST Bel-7402 (Parent) 19.59 ± 0.62 21.29 ± 1.14 26.92 ± 1.79 Bel-7402/ADMS 65.92 ± 1.41 56.88 ± 1.49 27.76 ± 1.00 Bel-7402/ADML 68.10 ± 1.88 58.84 ± 2.35 28.97 ± 1.42 Bel-7402/ADMV 91.93 ± 2.49 78.28 ± 1.23 ADAM7 27.57 ± 1.24 F 1512.300 1064.757 1.890 P 0.000 0.000 0.172 Notes: By LSD paired-comparison in both P-gp and MRP groups, except for Bel-7402/ADML vs. Bel-7402/ADMS (P > 0.05), there was no statistical significance. In other groups of resistant cells, there was a significant difference by paired-comparison (P < 0.01). In addition, for GSH/GST, there was no statistical significance by paired-comparison (P > 0.05). Figure 3 The flow cytometry histograms of MRP expression. With the MRP fluorescence staining rate increased gradually in the four groups, the peak dramatically moves to the right of the coordinate system.

Comments are closed.