Such averaging may be how the brain solves the multiple-clocks pr

Such averaging may be how the brain solves the multiple-clocks problem. This problem is that different auditory and visual stimuli are processed at different speeds, and arrive at different mechanisms (e.g., contributing to synchrony and integration judgements respectively) at different times, resulting in a distribution of neural timings measured across the different mechanisms. From the point of view of an individual mechanism contributing to this distribution, Obeticholic Acid it is uncertain to what extent the timing of its inputs reflects the true external timing of events or just internal

processing delays ( Scharnowski et al., 2013). But the average over the distribution provides a purer estimate of the neural timing that relates most reliably to the true timing of external events (see Fig. 5 for a schematic illustration, and Supplementary Discussion of how this could apply before and/or after unimodal signals). We propose that discrepancies GSK3235025 ic50 in timing between mechanisms are not minimised but perceived relative to their average timing. In contrast to the other theoretical alternatives,

this temporal renormalisation theory provides a fuller and more explicit account of all of our paradoxical findings: why a lesion produces opposite lags in different measures; why in normal participants different measures of subjective timing appear mutually repulsive, and how despite such disunity perception remains near-veridical on average across measures. To see how these phenomena emerge, note that in the multiple-clocks

analogy, if one clock is particularly slow then this will bias the average, relative to which even the correct clocks will seem to be fast. In the brain, the mean neural delay of each sensory Oxalosuccinic acid modality could also be attracted to particularly slow (or fast) neural events such that even events with relatively normal timing may be perceived as slightly fast (or slow). In PH, the integrative mechanisms probed by the McGurk task may have an unusually delayed auditory input, due to a selective brain lesion. The central tendency of the distribution will shift towards auditory lags, and relative to this, auditory signals from other unaffected mechanisms, such as those performing TOJ, will now be perceived to be leading. Yet on average across these measures, and despite pathological disruptions of timing, performance remains near-veridical. Renormalisation also explains the negative correlation we observed in healthy individuals, for whom auditory and visual timing may vary naturally in a similar (or opposite) direction to PH: in different people the greater the deviation in the auditory lead (lag) direction for some mechanisms, the more auditory leading (lagging) will be reported for other mechanisms, relative to the mean asynchrony, thus resulting in an apparent antagonism between mechanisms.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>