Taken together, the results presented above suggest that ORF134 deletion does not affect CyHV 3 pathogenicity in common carp and the protective immune response developed by surviving selleck chem U0126 fish. To further test these hypotheses, we investigated the effect of ORF134 deletion on viral load and on cytokine expression during CyHV 3 dis ease. Na ve common carp were inoculated by immersion in water containing the FL BAC revertant, FL BAC re vertant ORF134 Del or FL BAC revertant ORF134 Rev strains. At different times after inoculation gill, kidney and spleen were collected from randomly se lected fish. Viral loads were analyzed in gill and kidney by real time TaqMan PCR while cytokine ex pression was studied in spleen by RT qPCR.
Real time TaqMan PCR results demonstrated that fish infected with the Inhibitors,Modulators,Libraries three viral strains had statistically com parable viral loads in the gills and the kidney throughout the course of the experiment. Using the approach described in Figure 9, PCR reactions were performed on randomly selected fish demonstrated that each tank was infected with the correct strain and con firmed the absence of viral spread between tanks. Together, these results Inhibitors,Modulators,Libraries suggested that ORF134 deletion has no effect on viral load during pri mary acute infection. observed for IL 1B and IFN 2. We observed a moderate and late up regulation of TNF1 and TNF2. The expression level of CXCa in infected fish was comparable to mock infected fish or even down regulated for some strains at some time points.
Inhibitors,Modulators,Libraries Im portantly, the results presented in Figure 11 demonstrate that there is almost no difference in the expression levels of the cytokines Inhibitors,Modulators,Libraries studied between carp infected with three virus strains. The only significant differences observed be tween virus strains were for IFN 2 at day 4 post inoculation and for IL 6 at day 8 post inoculation. The expression level of IFN 2 at day 4 post inoculation was significantly higher in fish infected with FL BAC revertant ORF134 deleted as compared to FL BAC revertant and FL BAC revertant ORF134 Rev strains. However, this difference was rather small and was not observed for the other sampling points, suggesting that it could reflect data variation rather than the expression of ORF134 biological activities. Supporting the latter hypothesis, the expression level of IL 6 at day 8 post inoculation was significantly higher in the FL BAC revertant group as compared to the FL BAC revertant ORF134 Rev group.
The absence of cross contamination between tanks was controlled using the approach described in Figure 9. Together, these results suggested that ORF134 does not significantly affect the carp immune response under the experimental Inhibitors,Modulators,Libraries conditions selleck Dorsomorphin used. Finally, to investigate further the effect of ORF134 in CyHV 3 pathogenesis, the lesions induced by the FL BAC revertant, FL BAC revertant ORF134 Del and FL BAC revertant ORF134 Rev strains were compared in the gills and the kidney at various time points after in fection.