Results A total of 159 (33 1%) family physicians responded; 6

\n\nResults A total of 159 (33.1%) family physicians responded; 65.4% were men, 71.7% were Canadian medical graduates, and 46.5% practised in rural areas. Overall, 18.8% of family physicians said they regularly or frequently asked about NHP use; 24.7% counseled patients GKT137831 purchase about potential harms. Only 1.9% of physicians believed NHPs were usually beneficial,

but a similarly small number (8.4%) thought they were usually harmful. Most respondents were somewhat neutral; 59.7% said they never recommend NHPs for children, and a further 37.0% said they would only “sometimes” recommend NHPs.\n\nConclusion Most physicians believed that NHPs were probably of little benefit but not likely to be harmful. Most NHPs used were vitamins and minerals. Physicians recognized that NHPs were often used by parents for children, but in general they believed NHPs had little effect on their day-to-day medical practices. Thirty-eight (24.7%) of the 154 physicians had at least once

recommended an NHP (including vitamins) for their pediatric patients. Physicians believed that parents did not often disclose use of NHPs for their children, but at the same time physicians generally did not actively inquire.”
“Background: Fluconazole prophylaxis has demonstrated efficacy in single and multicenter randomized controlled trials without side effects or emergence of resistance. Additional evidence based on incidence of invasive Candida infections, multicenter buy LY2835219 data, resistance, and safety is desired. Methods: We conducted a case-control analysis of efficacy and safety of fluconazole prophylaxis from a multicenter database from a neonatal infection study that included 2017 infants smaller than 1250 grams from 95 NICUs, Infants receiving intravenous antifungal prophylaxis were pre-identified during enrollment in the parent study. For each infant receiving antifungal prophylaxis (case), three infants not receiving antifungal

(controls) were matched by birth weight ( 50 g), by gestational age (+/- 1 week), gender, and study site. Results: Fluconazole prophylaxis was administered to 127 patients [754 +/- 163 g birth weight (BW) and 25.4 +/- 1.7 weeks gestational age (GA)] and were compared with 399 control patients (756 +/- 163 g BW and 25.5 +/- 1.8 weeks GA). Invasive Candida infection occurred in 0.8% (I of 127) infants who received fluconazole prophylaxis compared with 7.3% (29 of 399) of matched controls (p = 0.006). Candida bloodstream infection occurred in 0.8% (1 of 127) fluconazole prophylaxis infants compared with 5.5% (22 of 399) of matched controls (p = 0.02).

Comments are closed.